Renal outcome of living kidney donors aged more than 70 years.

BACKGROUND: The number of marginal living kidney donors has increased. Medically complex donors who have hypertension, older age, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) have been more likely to be used. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of living kidney donors at a single center. We analyzed 309 living donors and divided them into three groups: group with older donors (aged ≥70 years) (n = 41), middle-aged (aged 46-69 years) (n = 239), and young donors (aged <46 years) (N = 29). Donor factors associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3b or worse within 5 years post-donation were investigated. RESULTS: Of the 309 live donors, 86 (27.8%) developed CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation. The incidence of CKD stage3b or worse within 5 years post-donation was significantly higher in older donor (p < 0.01). Cox regression models revealed that older donor ages and lower eGFR were significantly related to the development of CKD stage3b or worse, independent of comorbidities such as obesity and hypertension [hazard ratio (95% CI); 4.59 (1.02-20.6), p = 047, 0.95 (0.94-0.96), p ≤ 0.01, respectively]. However, recovery of eGFR 4-5 years after donation was noted in the middle-aged and older donor groups, whereas the level of eGFR remained unchanged in the young group. CONCLUSIONS: Older donors tend to develop CKD stage3b within 5 years post-donation but with the potential of recovery. Healthy older people (aged ≥70 years) could be candidates for living donors under careful monitoring of kidney function after donation.

Safety of Docetaxel in a Patient with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: There are limitations in treating advanced prostate cancer (PC), especially castration-resistant (CR) cases, in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). We describe the case of RTR with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) underwent living-related kidney transplantation. A year later, he was diagnosed with PC (prostate-specific antigen level: 998 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8. Radiographic examination revealed seminal vesicle invasion and multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated; however, the patient was diagnosed with CRPC 6 months later. Triweekly docetaxel therapy was administered 28 months after diagnosis. The patient successfully completed 7 cycles of this therapy without major adverse events. However, after the 7th cycle, he developed a high fever caused by an infection of ADPKD-associated renal cysts. Therefore, docetaxel was discontinued, and enzalutamide was started, followed by abiraterone, but without any effect. We then introduced cabazitaxel but discontinued it because of hepatic dysfunction. Hence, the patient underwent a docetaxel rechallenge. He was administered the PEGylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia prophylaxis. After 6 cycles of rechallenge docetaxel therapy, the patient accidentally fell, resulting in a cervical spine fracture and subsequent death due to respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel can be safely delivered to patients with CRPC after renal transplantation who are taking oral immunosuppressants. It can be a good treatment option for them.

Higher Donor Age and Severe Microvascular Inflammation Are Risk Factors for Chronic Rejection After Treatment of Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

Recent developments in intensive desensitization protocols have enabled kidney transplantation in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-sensitized recipients. However, cases of active antibody-mediated rejection (AABMR), when they occur, are difficult to manage, graft failure being the worst-case scenario. We aimed to assess the impact of our desensitization and AABMR treatment regimen and identify risk factors for disease progression. Among 849 patients who underwent living-donor kidney transplantation between 2014 and 2021 at our institution, 59 were diagnosed with AABMR within 1 year after transplantation. All patients received combination therapy consisting of steroid pulse therapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and plasmapheresis. Multivariable analysis revealed unrelated donors and preformed donor-specific antibodies as independent risk factors for AABMR. Five-year death-censored graft survival rate was not significantly different between patients with and without AABMR although 27 of 59 patients with AABMR developed chronic AABMR (CABMR) during the study period. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that a donor age greater than 59 years and microvascular inflammation (MVI) score (g + ptc) ≥4 at AABMR diagnosis were independent risk factors for CABMR. Our combination therapy ameliorated AABMR; however, further treatment options should be considered to prevent CABMR, especially in patients with old donors and severe MVI.

[Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal disease after third allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

An 18-year-old man underwent allogenic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). Ph+ALL relapsed 3 months after the first BMT, and the patient underwent a second BMT. However, Ph+ALL relapsed 4 months after the second BMT, and he received a haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT) from his father. Molecular complete remission was confirmed 29 days after haplo-PBSCT. However, the patient needed dialysis for end-stage renal disease due to thrombotic microangiopathy 3 years and 2 months after haplo-PBSCT. He received a kidney transplantation from his father 7 years and 10 months after haplo-PBSCT, and got off dialysis after the kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil was started for kidney transplantation, but the dose of immunosuppressive agents was reduced successfully without rejection soon after kidney transplantation. The patient has maintained long-term remission since the haplo-PBSCT, and his kidney function was restored by the kidney transplantation from his father.

The medical cost and outcome of desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation recipients with high immunological risks.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a well-established alternative in renal replacement therapy. Compared with hemodialysis, low-immunological-risk kidney transplantation can reduce the medical treatment costs associated with end-stage renal disease. However, there are few reports on whether high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation reduces the financial burden on governments. We investigated the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation in comparison with the cost of hemodialysis in Japan. METHODS: We compared the medical costs of high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation with those of hemodialysis. 15 patients who underwent crossmatch-positive and/or donor-specific antibody-positive kidney transplantations between 2020 and 2021 were enrolled in this study. The patients received intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab as desensitizing therapy. RESULTS: Acute antibody-mediated rejection was detected in nine (60%) recipients, while there were no indications of graft function deterioration during the follow-up. For each patient, the transplant hospitalization cost was 38 428 ± 8789 USD. However, the cumulative costs were 59 758 ± 10 006 USD and 79 781 ± 16 366 USD, at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Compared with hemodialysis (34 286 USD per year), high-immunological-risk kidney transplantation tends to be expensive in the first year, but the cost is likely to be lower than that of hemodialysis after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although kidney transplantation is initially expensive compared with hemodialysis, the medical cost becomes advantageous after 3 years even in kidney transplant recipients with high immunological risk.

Case Report: Suspected Hyperacute Rejection During Living Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of suspected hyperacute rejection during living kidney transplantation. CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old man underwent kidney transplantation in November 2019. Before the transplantation, immunologic tests revealed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies but not donor-specific HLA antibodies. The patient was intravenously administered 500 mg of methylprednisolone (MP) and basiliximab before perioperative blood flow reperfusion. After blood flow restoration, the transplanted kidney turned bright red and then blue. Hyperacute rejection was suspected. After the intravenous administration of 500 mg of MP and 30 g of intravenous immunoglobulin, the transplanted kidney gradually changed from blue to bright red. The initial postoperative urine output was good. On the 22nd day after the renal transplantation, the patient was discharged with a serum creatinine level of 2.38 mg/dL, and the function of the transplanted kidney gradually improved. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, non-HLA antibodies may have been a cause of the hyperacute rejection, which was managed with additional perioperative therapies.

Kidney Transplantation After Multiple Urinary Tract Conversion with an Ileal Conduit: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) after urinary tract conversion surgery is extremely difficult due to several complications. In our case, KTx was performed after multiple operative procedures, including diversion urethrostomy. CASE REPORT: The patient was a 46-year-old woman with a right atrophic kidney, an ectopic opening of the left ureter, and urethral dysplasia since birth. The patient underwent a right nephrectomy, left ureteral sigmoidostomy, Stamey surgery, augmentation ileocystoplasty, and left ureteroileostomy. Thereafter, she underwent nephrostomy, ileal conduit diversion, open sigmoid colectomy, and total cystectomy because of persistent urinary incontinence, sigmoid colon cancer, and recurrent cystitis. Her renal function gradually deteriorated, and hemodialysis was initiated. Before the KTx, she underwent laparoscopic left nephrectomy, an intraperitoneal adhesion debridement, and left ileal conduit resection. We dissected the left ileal conduit in the abdominal cavity and penetrated the anorectal side of the free ileal conduit into the wall of the right side of the abdomen. Thereafter, a kidney from a living donor was transplanted into the right iliac fossa through the existing right ileal conduit when the patient was 46 years old. The allograft function was stable without rejection for 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: We report the case of a patient who underwent multiple urethral modifications followed by ileal conduit transfer and living donor KTx, which progressed without major postoperative complications.

Clinicopathological Analyses of Chronic Renal Allograft Arteriopathy after Kidney Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Herein, we discuss clinicopathological analyses of cases of chronic renal allograft arteriopathy (CRA) after renal transplantation and clarify the mechanisms underlying the development and prognostic significance of CRA. METHODS: CRA was diagnosed in 34 renal allograft biopsy specimens (BSs) obtained from 27 renal transplant patients who were followed up at the Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery, Toda Chuo General Hospital, between January 2010 and December 2020. RESULTS: CRA was diagnosed at a median of 33.4 months post-transplantation. Of the 27 patients, 16 had a history of rejection. Among the 34 BSs showing evidence of CRA, CRA was mild (cv1 in Banff's classification) in 22, moderate (cv2) in 7, and severe (cv3) in 5 patients. We then classified the 34 BSs showing evidence of CRA based on their overall histopathological features as follows: cv alone seen in 11 (32%) BSs, cv + antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in 12 (35%), and cv + T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 8 (24%). Loss of the renal allograft occurred during the observation period in 3 patients (11%). Of the remaining patients with functioning grafts, deterioration of renal allograft function after biopsies occurred in 7 cases (26%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest that AMR contributes to CRA in 30-40% of cases, TCMR in 20-30% of cases, isolated v lesions in 15% of cases, and cv lesions alone in 30%. The intimal arteritis was a prognostic factor in CRA.

Pregnancy Complications and Impact on Kidney Allograft After Kidney Transplantation in IgA Nephropathy.

Pregnancy in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients has been challenging because of the high risk of maternal, fetal, and renal complications. Although patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN)-chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a high risk for hypertension in pregnancy (HIP), the maternal risk in KT recipients with IgAN as the etiology remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pregnant KT recipients who delivered at our hospital. The incidence of maternal and fetal complications and the impact on kidney allografts between the group with IgAN as the primary kidney disease and the group with other primary diseases were compared. The analysis included 73 pregnancies in 64 KT recipients. The IgAN group had a higher incidence of HIP than the non-IgAN group (69% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). IgAN as primary kidney disease and interval from transplantation to conception were associated with HIP (OR 3.33 [1.11-9.92], p = 0.03, OR 0.83 [0.72-0.96], p < 0.01, respectively). The 20-year graft survival or prevention of CKD stage 5 in group with IgAN was lower than that in the group with other primary disease (p < 0.01). KT recipients should be informed of the risk of HIP and possibility of long-term worsening of postpartum renal function.

Long-term prolonged-release tacrolimus outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation: The Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation study-II.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 10-year efficacy and safety of a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressive regimen on longer-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: Data from Japanese living donor kidney transplant recipients (n = 410) maintained on continuous prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression from 2009-2013 were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.9 years. RESULTS: A prolonged-release, tacrolimus-based combination regimen provided death-censored graft failure and all-cause death rates at 10 years of 7.0% and 6.8%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, acute and chronic rejection and 'throughout' (new-onset plus preexisting) diabetes mellitus were risk factors for death-censored graft failure. Recipient age ≥ 65 years, throughout diabetes mellitus and malignancy were common risk factors for all-cause death. Throughout diabetes mellitus was the most common risk factor for both death-censored graft failure and all-cause death. Additional analyses showed 10-year cumulative rates of death-censored graft failure were 14.0% and 5.4% for recipients with or without preexisting diabetes mellitus, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.009). All-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in the preexisting and non-diabetes mellitus groups, respectively (log-rank test: p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, retrospective, living donor kidney transplantation study, a prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive combination regimen provided 10-year death-censored graft failure rates of 14.0% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively; Similarly, 10-year all-cause death rates were 12.7% and 5.4% in diabetes mellitus and non-diabetes mellitus patients, respectively. To our knowledge, the data in this study are the first to provide 10-year transplant outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients under prolonged-release tacrolimus-based regimen.

A Comparative Study on the Variation in Seropositivity Rates After 2-Dose COVID-19 Vaccination Before or After Transplant: A Single-Center Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Many researchers have demonstrated that the seropositivity rate after SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus vaccination is lower in patients receiving oral immunosuppressants. In this article, we report on a comparative study on the seropositivity rate after 2 doses of coronavirus vaccine before or after kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 111 recipients vaccinated after transplant, 19 patients vaccinated before transplant, and 10 healthy patients. We retrospectively measured antibody titers using preserved serum samples. The antibody testing was performed 1 month and 3 months after vaccination. The measurement was via LABScreen COVID Plus, which enables simultaneous determination of 5 coronavirus protein antigens. RESULTS: Seropositivity to coronavirus antibodies was observed in all 19 patients vaccinated before transplant (100%) and in all the 10 healthy patients (100%). Forty- six of the 111 recipients (42%) vaccinated after transplant developed seropositivity. Analyzed at each time point after vaccination, the mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies was unchanged between 1 month and 3 months after vaccination in transplant recipients who were vaccinated after transplant and developed seropositivity. On the other hand, the antibody mean fluorescence intensity in patients vaccinated before transplant was markedly lower at 3 months (posttransplant). CONCLUSIONS: All patients with renal failure who were vaccinated before transplant showed a high seropositivity rate, similar to that in healthy patients. The seropositivity rate for each of the viral fragment antibodies in patients vaccinated before transplant was maintained, as seen in healthy patients. However, in patients vaccinated before transplant who tested positive for antibody production at 1 month after vaccination,the antibody mean fluorescence intensity at 3 months after vaccination (posttransplant) was remarkedly lower than the mean fluorescence intensity at 1 month, which was probably caused by the types of immunosuppressive regimens used atthe time of transplant.

Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Single Transplant Institute in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Although the effectiveness of vaccines in protecting the host from infection has been proven, few surveys have been conducted on changes in antibody levels after vaccination of kidney transplant recipients in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed serological responses in kidney transplant recipients after BNT162B2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with the use of a reagent capable of simultaneously specifying the antibody response to 5 proteins: a full-spike protein (extracellular domain), 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor-binding domain), and nucleocapsid. The analysis involved 111 patients who had follow-up over 1 month after having received the second of 2 coronavirus vaccines after kidney transplant. RESULTS: Antibodies were detected in 46 of 111 patients (41%). The antibody-positive rate in the kidney transplant group tended to be lower than that in the healthy control group, which showed an antibody- positive rate of 100%. When the antibody-positive rate was analyzed by the type of immunosuppressor used, the rate was 36% (37/100) for patients who used tacrolimus at the time of vaccination and 90% (9/10) for patients who used cyclosporine. Patients administered CD20 antibody (rituximab) before and/or after transplant showed a lower production of antibodies, which was supported by a smaller number of CD19- and CD20-positive cells in the peripheral blood as well as a shorter period between rituximab administration and vaccination. The percentage of responding viral fragments varied greatly among individual patients and showed no uniformity in the kidney transplant group, whereas the mean fluorescence intensity of individual fragments showed a certain tendency in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate timing of vaccination should be considered in transplant recipients who use tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil combination and rituximab as these drugs are deeply related to a lower antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination.

Safe Renal Transplantation to the Extraperitoneal Cavity in Children Weighing Less Than 15 kg.

Pediatric renal transplantation is associated with various surgical complications due to the complexity of the technique and the often-fragile condition of patients with end-stage renal disease. We evaluated the surgical complications associated with renal transplantation via the extraperitoneal approach in pediatric recipients. This retrospective study enrolled 280 patients younger than 16 years old who underwent renal transplantation via the extraperitoneal approach: 216 patients underwent transplant placement in the iliac fossa like in adults, and 64 underwent transplant placement in the distal part of the original renal lower pole (the extraperitoneal cavity). On the basis of the Clavien-Dindo classification, 30 patients (10.7%) showed grade 2 complications and 12 patients (4.3%) showed grade 3 or higher complications. None of the patients showed gastrointestinal complications. In a Cox regression analysis, grade 2 or higher complications were significantly associated with weight less than 15 kg (P = .027) and operative times longer than 245 minutes (P = .029). Among the 49 patients weighing less than 15 kg with an allograft placed in a distal portion of the original renal lower pole, only 3 patients (6.1%) developed surgical complications. Thus, allograft placement in the extraperitoneal cavity can be performed safely in children weighing less than 15 kg.

Case Report of COVID-19 Infection After Kidney Transplant Treated With Casirivimab-Imdevimab and Mycophenolate Mofetil Changed to Everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Casirivimab-imdevimab is a cocktail of 2 monoclonal antibodies designed to prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Casirivimab-imdevimab has been approved in Japan for treating mild to moderate COVID-19; however, to our knowledge, there are no reports of its use after kidney transplant from a live donor. Everolimus, an antineoplastic chemotherapy drug, is expected to be effective in inhibiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and preventing its replication, which may facilitate treatment. Here, we report a case of COVID-19 infection after kidney transplant that was initially treated with casirivimab-imdevimab and mycophenolate mofetil but was later changed to everolimus. CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old man underwent living donor kidney transplant from his mother in 2017. Immunosuppression therapy was underway through the administration of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. In early September 2021, he was diagnosed as having COVID-19 and was hospitalized on day 3. On hospitalization, mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued and casirivimab-imdevimab and heparin were started. The patient started an everolimus regimen on day 5. The clinical course was successful without rejection. There was no exacerbation of COVID-19; the patient's serum creatinine levels and renal function had otherwise remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: We could safely treat a patient with casirivimab-imdevimab after kidney transplant. It is suggested that casirivimab-imdevimab can prevent COVID-19 from becoming severe and can be administered without worsening renal function. In addition, everolimus may have inhibited the spread of the virus and prevented it from replicating.

Japanese Single-Center Experience of Kidney Transplant: Experience in a Japanese Private Hospital.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the results of cases of kidney transplant (KTx) that were conducted at the Toda Chuo General Hospital, a private hospital located in Saitama, Japan. METHODS: A total of 312 patients with end-stage renal failure underwent KTx between January 1992 and December 2019 at Toda Chuo General Hospital. There were 191 men and 121 women. Their mean age was 45.7 years. Of the 312 cases, 310 were living-related KTx, while 2 were deceased donor KTx. The immunosuppressive treatment protocol mainly consisted of 4-drug therapy with methylprednisolone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and basiliximab. RESULTS: Patient survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 99.3% at 5 years, and 97.3% at 10 years. Renal allograft survival was 98.4% at 1 year, 91.7% at 5 years, and 86.5% at 10 years. However, death-censored renal allograft survival was 98.7% at 1 year, 92.4% at 5 years, and 89.0% at 10 years. Among the 312 patients, 33 grafts were lost during the observation period. The loss was because of chronic antibody-mediated rejection in 19 patients, death with function in 6 patients, and acute antibody-mediated rejection in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients and their grafts, which were managed following the immunosuppression protocol at our institute, was relatively good. KTx in a private hospital in Japan is at par with the global standard.

Suspected Pneumonia Caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection may become more severe in those who have undergone kidney transplantation than in the general population. False-negative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results have been reported for COVID-19 infection. Patients might carry infection even though RT-PCR results are negative. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man with a 19-year history of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation presented with fever and arthralgia. Although the RT-PCR result was negative, a focal slit-glass shadow in the left upper lobe on computed tomography (CT) suggested COVID-19 pneumonia. His symptoms did not improve until after 10 days, and CT showed multiple slit-glass shadows in the bilateral lung fields. However, RT-PCR remained negative. The patient was admitted, and mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued. Anticoagulants were administered on the third day of hospitalization. Because of poor oxygenation, the patient was intubated in the intensive care unit on the fifth day, and sivelestat sodium was administered. The patient was extubated on the 12th day after improvement in oxygenation. There was no exacerbation, and CT showed improvements on day 51. CONCLUSION: We report a case of pneumonia with suspected COVID-19 infection 18 years after living donor kidney transplantation. If COVID-19 is suspected, infection control and aggressive therapeutic interventions should be undertaken while considering the possibility of a positive result.

Allogeneic Kidney Transplantation After COVID-19: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing organ transplantation are immunosuppressed and already at risk of various diseases. We report about a patient who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) without a recurrence of infection. CASE REPORT: A 68-year-old woman presented with end-stage renal failure owing to primary autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; accordingly, hemodialysis was initiated in September 2020. Her medical history included bilateral osteoarthritis, lumbar spinal stenosis, hypertension, and hyperuricemia. In mid-January 2021, she contracted severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection from her husband. Both of them were hospitalized and received conservative treatment. Because their symptoms were mild, they were discharged after 10 days. The patient subsequently underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation from her husband who recovered from COVID-19 in March 2021. Before kidney transplantation, her COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test was negative, confirming the absence of pre-existing COVID-19 immediately before the procedure. Computed tomography revealed no pneumonia. Initial immunosuppression was induced by administering tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, basiliximab, rituximab, and 30 g of intravenous immunoglobulin. Double-filtration plasmapheresis and plasma exchange were performed once before ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. The renal allograft functioned immediately, and the postoperative course was normal without rejection. COVID-19 did not recur. In addition, her serum creatinine levels and renal function had otherwise remained stable. CONCLUSION: Living kidney transplantation was safely performed in a patient with COVID-19 without postoperative complications or rejection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the possibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection during transplantation surgery must be considered.

Two Laparotomy Surgeries to Achieve Hemostasis After Kidney Transplantation in a Patient With Frailty: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of frailty before and after kidney transplantation is becoming more important in the aging population. It is recommended to recognize the post-transplant risks and establish a treatment strategy. We report the case of a patient who underwent 2 laparotomy hemostasis procedures due to frailty after kidney transplantation. CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old woman presented with end-stage renal failure due to an unknown primary disease. She was also found to be frail when assessed using the physical frailty phenotype. She underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation from her husband at the end of March 2020. On the first postoperative day, re-operation for hematoma evacuation was performed. The bleeding point could not be identified at that time. Progression of anemia was observed on the sixth postoperative day, and computed tomography showed no obvious bleeding. Subsequently, the renal allograft started functioning immediately, without rejection. However, emergency laparotomy for hematoma removal was performed on the 22nd postoperative day. Bleeding had occurred from the anastomotic region of the renal allograft artery and the external iliac artery. Her serum creatinine levels and renal function remained stable one month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We encountered a case of living-donor kidney transplantation in a frail older woman who underwent 2 laparotomies due to hemorrhage. Perioperative risk management is necessary for patients with a high risk of postoperative bleeding. To ensure a good outcome, preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation is important for patients with frailty.

Desensitization Regimen Consisting of High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Plasmapheresis, and Rituximab (an Anti-CD20 Antibody), Without Eculizumab and/or Bortezomib, in 41 Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Antibody-mediated rejection in patients with positive crossmatches can be severe and result in sudden onset of oliguria, leading to graft loss. In an attempt to prevent posttransplant oliguria, we adopted a preoperative desensitization protocol involving the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin/plasmapheresis and the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, in 41 transplant recipients with positive crossmatch test results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical courses of the 41 kidney transplant recipients, paying special attention to renal graft function, urine volume, and changes in the titers of donor-specific antibodies. RESULTS: Four grafts were lost during an average of 4.5-year follow-up. Average graft function was excellent, with a serum creatinine level of 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL. Sufficient urine output, with no oliguria or anuria, was achieved postoperatively in 40 of the 41 patients. However, among the 34 patients who underwent graft biopsies, the biopsies revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection in 21 patients (62%), and chronic antibodymediated rejection in 10 patients (30%). CONCLUSIONS: The high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment included in our desensitization protocol was shown to be safe and effective for achieving successful transplant outcomes and allowed the avoidance of more aggressive B-cell-targeted treatments, such as C5 inhibitors and/or proteosome inhibitors, for preventing posttransplant oliguria and anuria.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for the Origin of De Novo Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Kidney Allograft: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: We present a rare case of de novo renal cell carcinoma that developed in an allograft kidney 14 years after transplantation. CASE REPORT: A 39-year-old man underwent living donor kidney transplantation from his mother. After 14 years, routine screening ultrasonography revealed a solid mass of 30-mm diameter in the kidney allograft. Partial nephrectomy was performed by clamping the renal artery under in situ cooling. Tissue histology revealed clear cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins. We explored the tumor's genetic origin using fluorescence in situ hybridization to analyze the X and Y chromosomes of the tumor cells. Postoperative hemodialysis was avoided, and the patient's serum creatinine level remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization clearly indicated that the tumor originated from the donor and that the tumor vasculature originated from the recipient. The patient recovered well and remains without any tumor recurrence.